The
capital asset pricing model was developed in mid-1960s by three
researchers William Sharpe, John Lintner and Jan Mossin
independently. Consequently, the model is often referred to as
Sharpe-Lintner-Mosin Capital Asset Pricing Model.
The
capital asset pricing model or CAPM is really an extension of the
portfolio theory of Markowitz. The portfolio theory is a description
of how rational investors should build efficient portfolio and select
optimal portfolio. The capital asset pricing model derives the
relationship between the expected return and the risk of the
individual securities and portfolios in the capital markets if
everyone behaved in the way of portfolio theory suggested.
The
relationship between the risk and return established by the security
market line is known as CAPM. Basically it’s a simple linear
relationship. The higher the value of beta, higher would be the risk
of the security. And therefore, larger would be the return expected
buy the investor. In other words all securities are expected to yield
returns commensurate with their riskiness as measured by beta. The
relationship is not only valid for individual securities but it is
also valid for all portfolios whether efficient or inefficient.
Assumptions
- Investors make their investment decision on the basis of risk return assessment measured in terms of expected return and standard deviation of returns.
- The purchase and sale of a security can be undertaken in infinitely divisible units.
- Purchase and sales by a single investor cannot affect prices. This means there is prefect completion where investors in total determine prices by their action.
- There is no transaction cost. Given the fact that the transaction cost is small. They are probably of minor importance in investment decisions. Hence they are ignored.
- There are no personal income taxes.
- The investor can lend or borrow any amount of funds desired at a rate of interest equal to the rate of riskless securities.
- The investor can sell short any amount of any shares.
- Investor shares homogeneity of expectations.
0 Comments